
QUARTERLY HOMOEPATHIC DIGEST
© Centre For Excellence In Homeopathy
who have offended him, who has doubts about his identity; without hesitation we may prescribe
Aurum.
In para 153 of the Organon, Hahnemann has very clearly formulated that only the
characteristic, rare, peculiar symptoms are to be considered. The question rightly arises as to why
if the above symptoms are to be considered the psoric symptoms of the medicines should be
ascertained for prescription of the right medicine. Because that it is the unique sure way, which
allows us to know with certainly whether the patient is on the curative path, whether he has
already been cured and we can give him the discharge certificate, Whether we can hope for cure,
how far we have come and how much more to come with the medicine. And we know
considering an acute pathological picture, how we should handle or not and in cases where we
observe that the psoric symptoms abate it is the rule that nothing should be done and we should
not intervene wrongly with a medicine which would suppress the acute picture and aggravate the
condition of the patient. In the Aurum example we know that he is on the path of cure when his
qualms of conscience, his feeling of forsakenness and lack of self-confidence, all abate and not
just when his desire for hard bread is gone. And in the Mercurius case when his qualms of
conscience, feeling of forsakenness and homesickness all go away and not when his desire for
butter or yellow-staining perspiration, perspiration of head during sleep are all ameliorated. The
disappearance of the symptoms on basis of which we gave the medicine will indicate cure or
suppression of the symptoms. Only the disappearance of the fundamental illness, Psora, with the
alteration of the individual's feelings of life, indicate cure.
Are these psoric symptoms not essential at all for repertorisation of the disease picture?
Do they only serve to enable us to follow the development of the case: The deep psoric
symptoms which indicate how the patient lives his life, how he suffers from loss of values of life,
how the Psora expresses itself in this patient, are characteristic, I would like to even say, they are
so much possibly characteristic, that they won't be lost while repertorising. We should be
thankful to our teacher Paschero for his thorough instructions for diagnosis of the
biopathographic anamnesis, the fundamental basis of the entire clinical homoeopathy.
A small example should throw light on what I have said. A Uruguayan woman, Maria
Julia 39 years, came to my clinic November 1982, for a Lupus erythematosus disseminatus. This
diagnosis had been made through laboratory tests and skin biopsy. Her biopathographic history
gave following clear symptoms: Feeling of forsakenness, constantly dwelling upon unpleasant
past, feeling that she has lost divine grace, anxiety that her sons would die of saturation, fear of
death (worst from the time she learnt of her diagnosis ) very easily excited against her husband
and sons who she won't see for hours, and grudging. Interrogation: Anguish, fear of
hallucinations, fear of heights, she uncovers her feet in bed, disposed to rage before menstruation
and irritable on waking up. The medicine was Sepia, the miasm Syphilis. The medicine brought
about what we expected in serious organ changes: a severe and long continued aggravation,
happily followed by slow and continuous relief which indicated that here before us was a curable
disease, contrary to the clinical diagnosis. From her first consultation till now I had to give 3
doses of this medicine, because of reappearance of the symptoms on which the first prescription
was based, always with progressive improvement of the L.e. till a normal clinical condition
came. 3 months before (July 1984) she rang me up from Rocha where she lived in Uruguay and
said as follows: Since 14 days she has a severe pain in the left shoulder which radiate to the